In CAT 2024, the DILR (Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning) section typically comprised 5 sets (an increase from 4 in earlier years), with a mix of DI and LR sets. Out of these, roughly 2–3 sets were DI-focused in each slot. Each DI set had 4–5 questions, often in MCQ and/or TITA formats. Overall difficulty across slots ranged from Easy–Moderate to Moderate, with some slot-wise variation.
🔎 SLOT-WISE DI ANALYSIS
📌 CAT 2024 – Slot 1
- Number of Sets: 5 (3 DI sets + 2 LR sets)
- DI Sets: 3 sets, each with 4 questions
- Difficulty Level: Moderate overall for DI
- Question Types in DI:
- Graph-based sets (bar charts, line graphs)
- Table/chart interpretation
- Mixture of straightforward computations and multi-layered inference
- Format: Mostly MCQs; some TITA questions embedded in DI sets (depending on set)
- Key Observations:
- DI sets were “moderate”—not very time-consuming individually, but required accuracy in reading and multi-step calculations.
- Some sets involved combining information from multiple small charts/tables.
- Careful scanning for relevant rows/columns helped avoid wasted time.
- Avoided extremely convoluted data; focus was on clear interpretation with 2–3 levels of inference.
- Good Attempts & Accuracy:
- Attempting about 8–9 DI questions (i.e., about 2 full DI sets plus parts of a third) with ~80–85% accuracy was considered a safe target for a high percentile in the DILR section.
📌 CAT 2024 – Slot 2
- Number of Sets: 5 (2 DI sets + 3 LR sets)
- DI Sets: 2 sets, one with 4 questions, one with 4–5 questions
- Difficulty Level: Easy to Moderate for DI sets
- Question Types in DI:
- Profitability/table interpretation (e.g., firms’ financial metrics, ratios)
- Distribution/rating charts (e.g., ecommerce rating distributions, cumulative percentages)
- Occasionally mixed charts (e.g., combining tabular data with simple graphs)
- Format: Primarily MCQs; some TITA questions in DI sets depending on the set
- Key Observations:
- Compared to previous year, DI sets were relatively easier—fewer layers of inference.
- Straightforward computations (e.g., percentage changes, ratios) were common.
- Candidates reported that clear labeling in charts/tables made data lookup faster.
- Time saved here could be reallocated to trickier LR sets.
- Good Attempts & Accuracy:
- Attempting around 6–7 DI questions (i.e., about 1 full DI set plus parts of the second) with ~85%+ accuracy was a good benchmark.
📌 CAT 2024 – Slot 3
- Number of Sets: 5 (2 DI sets + 3 LR sets)
- DI Sets: 2 sets, each with 5 questions
- Difficulty Level: Moderate for DI sets (slightly tougher than Slot 2, but still manageable)
- Question Types in DI:
- Chart interpretation (e.g., bar graphs on app subscriptions, line graphs on temperature trends)
- Tabular data (e.g., GDP of countries, financial metrics)
- Mixed DI (combining multiple small data blocks)
- Format: Mix of MCQs and TITA questions (e.g., 3 MCQs + 2 TITA in a set)
- Key Observations:
- DI sets had moderate inference depth: often required multi-step filtering (e.g., selecting top/bottom categories, computing derived ratios).
- Some sets demanded careful attention to detail (units, time periods).
- Still more straightforward than many LR sets in Slot 3.
- Candidates with strong tabular reading skills gained time advantage.
- Good Attempts & Accuracy:
- Attempting around 7–8 DI questions with ~80–85% accuracy aligned with scoring ~27–30 in DILR for a high percentile.
📊 Comparative Snapshot of DI in CAT 2024
Parameter | Slot 1 | Slot 2 | Slot 3 |
No. of DI Sets | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Questions per DI Set | 4 | 4–5 | 5 |
DI Difficulty | Moderate | Easy–Moderate | Moderate |
Common DI Types | Mixed charts/tables | Straightforward tables/graphs | Charts + tables with moderate inference |
Format (MCQ vs TITA) | Mostly MCQs (some TITA) | Primarily MCQs (few TITA) | Mix of MCQs and TITA |
Good DI Attempts | ~8–9 questions | ~6–7 questions | ~7–8 questions |
Accuracy for High Percentile | ~80–85% | ~85%+ | ~80–85% |
🔑 Key Takeaways for CAT 2025 DI Preparation
- Consistent DI Practice:
- Regularly solve varied DI sets (tables, bar/line charts, pie charts, mixed data) to build speed in data extraction.
- Focus on both quick-read tactics (e.g., scanning relevant rows/columns) and deeper inference (e.g., deriving ratios, trends).
- Accuracy Over Attempts:
- In DI, wrong answers carry negative marking in MCQs. Prioritize accuracy: if unsure about multi-step inference, skip or mark TITA if confident.
- Cultivate elimination skills: sometimes a rough estimate of ranges helps eliminate wrong options without full calculation.
- TITA Familiarity:
- Many DI sets include TITA questions where negative marking is absent. Practice these to boost safe attempts.
- Ensure precision, since TITA requires exact values/formats.
- Time Management:
- In mocks, allocate ~12–15 minutes for DI (out of 40 for DILR, shared with LR). Adjust based on personal strengths: if DI is a strength, aim to finish DI sets quickly and channel saved time to LR.
- Varied Difficulty Exposure:
- CAT DI can vary from very straightforward computations to moderate multi-layered inference. Practice both “easy” and “moderate” DI regularly so you’re prepared for any slot variation.
- Error Analysis & Logging:
- Maintain an error log: note the nature of mistakes (data misread, calculation slip, misinterpretation). Review weekly to avoid repeats.
- Integration with LR Practice:
- Since DI and LR share the same section, simulate actual test conditions: after finishing DI, switch mindset to LR puzzles. Practice seamlessly transitioning.
📅 CAT 2025 DI Prep Plan (June – November)
Below is a month-wise roadmap focusing on Data Interpretation. Adjust weekly/daily schedules based on your overall prep (VARC, QA, LR). The plan assumes you begin in June 2024–25 cycle and take regular mocks.
✅ JUNE – Foundation & Exposure
- Goals: Familiarize with basic DI formats; build comfort with reading data quickly.
- Activities:
- Daily: Solve 1 simple DI set (4 Qs) in untimed mode; types: single-table, single-bar-chart.
- Weekly: 1 mixed DI practice session (table + simple chart together).
- Concept Review: Techniques for reading tables/charts, basics of percentages, ratios, averages.
- Resource: Assemble a “DI Toolkit” sheet listing formulae/tricks (e.g., how to convert pie-chart percentages to values).
- Outcome: Comfortable interpreting straightforward data; minimal calculation errors.
✅ JULY – Speed Building Phase
- Goals: Improve speed in data extraction and basic computations.
- Activities:
- Daily: Timed solving of 1 DI set (4 Qs) in 5–6 minutes. Focus on accuracy within time.
- Weekly: 2 sessions of mixed DI sets (e.g., 2 sets per session) in timed mode (~12 minutes for 2 sets).
- Error Log: Start logging slip-ups (e.g., misreads, arithmetic mistakes).
- Learn Approximations: Practice quick estimation techniques to eliminate options when exact calc is time-consuming.
- Outcome: Ability to clear easy-to-moderate DI sets in under allotted time with good accuracy.
✅ AUGUST – Moderate & Multi-layered DI
- Goals: Tackle medium-difficulty DI sets involving 2–3 levels of inference.
- Activities:
- Weekly:
- 2–3 DI sets of moderate complexity (e.g., combined tables + charts, multi-parameter data) in timed mode (6–7 minutes per set).
- Review and analyze errors thoroughly.
- Focus Topics:
- Multi-dimensional tables (e.g., data broken by categories and time periods).
- Complex bar/line chart combinations (e.g., reading two related charts to answer questions).
- Data sufficiency style DI (deciding if given data is enough without full calc).
- Error Analysis: Categorize if errors stem from misinterpretation vs. calculation; practice accordingly.
- Weekly:
- Outcome: Confidence in solving moderate DI sets, reduced time per inference step.
✅ SEPTEMBER – Integration with Mocks & Speed-Accuracy Balance
- Goals: Seamless integration of DI practice in full mocks and sectionals; calibrate timing.
- Activities:
- Mocks:
- In each mock, track time spent on DI. Aim to finish 2–3 DI sets in ~12 minutes.
- After mock, analyze DI performance: which sets you skipped or got wrong, why.
- Sectionals: Weekly dedicated DILR sectionals (40 minutes including LR). Within sectionals, target ~12–15 minutes for DI.
- Mixed Difficulty: Include a mix of easy, moderate, and a few ‘tricky’ DI sets in practice to simulate slot variation.
- Mocks:
- Outcome: Well-calibrated time allocation in DILR; ability to attempt safe DI questions first and reserve tougher ones if time permits.
✅ OCTOBER – Fine-Tuning & Advanced DI
- Goals: Strengthen inferences for high-difficulty DI and maximize TITA opportunities.
- Activities:
- Advanced Sets: Practice 1–2 high-difficulty DI sets per week (e.g., less straightforward charts, multi-layer tables). Focus on deciding early whether to attempt or skip.
- TITA Practice: Identify typical TITA DI patterns; practice ensuring precise answers under no-negative-marking conditions (e.g., exact decimal formatting).
- Revision: Revisit your “DI Toolkit” for quick formulas/tricks; ensure no concept gaps.
- Peer Discussion / Group Study: Discuss tricky DI sets with peers or mentors to learn alternative solution paths.
- Outcome: Ability to judge quickly whether a high-difficulty DI is worth the time; maximize safe DI attempts.
✅ NOVEMBER – Final Polishing & Exam Readiness
- Goals: Consolidate strategies; ensure consistency under exam pressure.
- Activities:
- Final Sectionals: 3–4 DILR sectionals per week under strict timed conditions. Aim for target DI attempts (~8–9 questions) with >85% accuracy.
- Last-Minute Revision: Quick review of common DI pitfalls (e.g., unit misalignment, misreading axes). Go through your error log to avoid repeating mistakes.
- Exam Strategy Drill: Decide slot-wise DI approach (e.g., attempt easier DI sets first in exam, then decide on moderate ones based on remaining time). Practice this in sectionals.
- Mock Analysis: In last 2 weeks, focus primarily on accuracy rather than chasing higher attempts.
- Outcome: A robust, repeatable DI strategy: quick screening of sets, prioritized attempts, strong accuracy.
- Time Audits: In mocks, note exact time spent on each DI set. If you consistently overshoot, adjust practice difficulty/timing.
- Stress Management: Build confidence by progressively increasing difficulty, so on exam day you remain calm when encountering moderate DI sets.
- Balance with LR: Since DILR is combined, ensure DI practice also trains you to transition smoothly into LR within the 40-minute window.
For more information or to buy magic toolkit product contact or click
CAT 2025 Magic Toolkit